Continuing review of ethics in clinical trials: a surveillance study in Iran
Dublin Core
Title
Continuing review of ethics in clinical trials: a surveillance study in Iran
Author
Asghari, Fariba
Ghalandarpoorattar, Seyedeh Mojgan
Ghalandarpoorattar, Seyedeh Mojgan
Language
English
Publication Date
20130908
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine adherence to ethical principles during research and the necessity to conduct systematic and continuing review of ongoing research in Iran. All clinical trials approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) ongoing in 2007 (n = 21) were reviewed through receiving principal investigators' (PIs) reports, as well as reviewing patient consent forms. Two questionnaires were sent to PIs, one to collect information about the study and the other to evaluate PIs' perception and awareness about ethical codes of clinical trials. A representative of the TUMS research ethics committee was sent to the research site to fill a checklist by reviewing the obtained informed consent and fill the other checklist by interviewing a sample of participants regarding their perception of their volunteer participation in the clinical trial and receiving adequate information. Only in 66.7% of the surveyed trials the objectives of the trial had been explained in the informed consent, and in 38.6% of the trials it was mentioned in informed consent that participation is voluntary. Among participants, 34.7% (n = 26) were not aware they were enrolled in a research project, 29.3% (n = 22) had not understood the information they had received, 74.7% (n = 56) did not know they could refuse to participate and still receive care from their physician, and 58.7% did not realize they were free to drop out of the study at any time. The results point to the need for continuing review of clinical research, especially clinical trials, and the necessity for thorough assessment of patient consent forms during the process of approval in terms of their contents and their understandability.
Primary Classification
18.2
Secondary Classification
18.2; 1.3.9; 8.3.1
Primary keywords
clincial trials [pri]; informed consent [pri]; research ethics [pri]
Secondary keywords
ethical review; questionnaire; research ethics committees; research subjects
Subject
Iran
Subject
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Journal Article
Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 2013 September; 6:8: 6 p.
Link for Internet access
Note
Copyright © 2013 Fariba Asghari et al.; licensee Tehran Univ. Med. Sci.
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License
Primary Document Type
j
Subject Captions
e
Bibliography
16 refs.
ISSN
20080387 (online)
Collection
Citation
“Continuing review of ethics in clinical trials: a surveillance study in Iran,” Islamic Medical & Scientific Ethics, accessed January 16, 2025, https://imse.ibp.georgetown.domains/items/show/38191.