Mental suffering in protracted political conflict:feeling broken or destroyed
Dublin Core
Title
Mental suffering in protracted political conflict:feeling broken or destroyed
Author
Barber, Brian K.
McNeely, Clea A.
El Sarraj, Eyad
Daher, Mahmoud
Giacaman, Rita
Arafat, Cairo
Barnes, William
Abu Mallouh, Mohammed
McNeely, Clea A.
El Sarraj, Eyad
Daher, Mahmoud
Giacaman, Rita
Arafat, Cairo
Barnes, William
Abu Mallouh, Mohammed
Publisher
5/27/16
Language
English
Publication Date
20160527
Abstract
Purpose: This mixed-methods exploratory study identified and then developed and validated a quantitative measure of a new construct of mental suffering in the occupied Palestinian territory: feeling broken or destroyed. Methods: Group interviews were conducted in 2011 with 68 Palestinians, most aged 30-40, in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip to discern local definitions of functioning. Interview participants articulated of a type of suffering not captured in existing mental health instruments used in regions of political conflict. In contrast to the specific difficulties measured by depression and PTSD (sleep, appetite, energy, flashbacks, avoidance, etc.), participants elaborated a more existential form of mental suffering: feeling that one's spirit, morale and/or future was broken or destroyed, and emotional and psychological exhaustion. Participants articulated these feelings when describing the rigors of the political and economic contexts in which they live. We wrote survey items to capture these sentiments and administered these items-along with standard survey measures of mental health-to a representative sample of 1,778 32-43 year olds in the occupied Palestinian territory. The same survey questions also were administered to a representative subsample (n = 508) six months earlier, providing repeated measures of the construct. Results: Across samples and time, the feeling broken or destroyed scale: 1) comprised a separate factor in exploratory factor analyses, 2) had high inter-item consistency, 3) was reported by both genders and in all regions, 4) showed discriminate validity via moderate correlations with measures of feelings of depression and trauma-related stress, and 5) was more commonly experienced than either feelings of depression or trauma-related stress. Conclusion: Feeling broken or destroyed can be reliably measured and distinguished from conventional measures of mental health. Such locally grounded and contextualized measures should be identified and included in assessments of the full impact of protracted political conflict on functioning.
Primary Classification
17.1
Secondary Classification
17.1;9.1
Primary keywords
politics--[pri];psychological stress--[pri];suffering--[pri];violence--[pri]
Secondary keywords
adults;Arabs;females;interviews;males;public health;quality of life;socialeconomic factors;surveys
Subject
Israel--[pri]
Subject
Occupied Palestinian Territory--[pri]
Subject
post-traumatic stress disorder
Journal Article
PLoS One2016 May 27; 11(5):17 p.
Link for Internet access
Note
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Call Number
citation
Bibliography
64 refs
ISSN
19326203 (online)
Collection
Citation
“Mental suffering in protracted political conflict:feeling broken or destroyed,” Islamic Medical & Scientific Ethics, accessed January 17, 2025, https://imse.ibp.georgetown.domains/items/show/37868.