Shared clinical decision making:a Saudi Arabian perspective
Dublin Core
Title
Shared clinical decision making:a Saudi Arabian perspective
Author
AlHaqwi, Ali I.
AlDrees, Turke M.
AlRumayyan, Ahmad
AlFarhan, Ali I.
Alotaibi, Sultan S.
AlKhasban, Hesham I.
Badri, Motasim
AlDrees, Turke M.
AlRumayyan, Ahmad
AlFarhan, Ali I.
Alotaibi, Sultan S.
AlKhasban, Hesham I.
Badri, Motasim
Publisher
2015/12/00
Language
English
Publication Date
20151200
Abstract
Objectives: To determine preferences of patients regarding their involvement in the clinical decision making process and the related factors in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a major family practice center in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between March and May 2012. Multivariate multinomial regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with patients preferences. Results: The study included 236 participants. The most preferred decision-making style was shared decision-making (57%), followed by paternalistic (28%), and informed consumerism (14%). The preference for shared clinical decision making was significantly higher among male patients and those with higher level of education, whereas paternalism was significantly higher among older patients and those with chronic health conditions, and consumerism was significantly higher in younger age groups. In multivariate multinomial regression analysis, compared with the shared group, the consumerism group were more likely to be female [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) =2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-6.27, p=0.008] and non-dyslipidemic (AOR=2.90, 95% CI: 1.03-8.09, p=0.04), and the paternalism group were more likely to be older (AOR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, p=0.04), and female (AOR=2.47, 95% CI: 1.32-4.06, p=0.008). Conclusion: Preferences of patients for involvement in the clinical decision-making varied considerably. In our setting, underlying factors that influence these preferences identified in this study should be considered and tailored individually to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.
Primary Classification
8.1
Secondary Classification
8.1;9.4
Primary keywords
decision making--[pri];patient participation--[pri];physician patient relationship
Secondary keywords
age factors;education;questionnaires;paternalism
Subject
Saudi Arabia--[pri]
Journal Article
Saudi Medical Journal2015 December; 36(12):1472-1476
Link for Internet access
Note
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Call Number
citation
Bibliography
17 refs
ISSN
03795284 (print)
Collection
Citation
“Shared clinical decision making:a Saudi Arabian perspective,” Islamic Medical & Scientific Ethics, accessed January 18, 2025, https://imse.ibp.georgetown.domains/items/show/37407.