Saudi views on consenting for research on medical records and leftover tissue samples
Dublin Core
Title
Saudi views on consenting for research on medical records and leftover tissue samples
Author
Al Qadire, Mohammad M.
Hammami, Muhammad M.
Adublhameed, Hunida M.
Al Gaai, Eman A.
Hammami, Muhammad M.
Adublhameed, Hunida M.
Al Gaai, Eman A.
Publisher
10/18/10
Language
English
Publication Date
20101018
Abstract
Background:Consenting for retrospective medical records-based research (MR) and leftover tissue-based research (TR) continues to be controversial. Our objective was to survey Saudis attending outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital on their personal preference and perceptions of norm and current practice in relation to consenting for MR and TR. Methods:We surveyed 528 Saudis attending clinics at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia to explore their preferences and perceptions of norm and current practice. The respondents selected one of 7 options from each of 6 questionnaires. Results:Respondents' mean (SD) age was 33 (11) years, 42% were males, 56% were patients, 84% had ≥ secondary school education, and 10% had previously volunteered for research. Respectively, 40% and 49% perceived that the norm is to conduct MR and TR without consent and 38% and 37% with general or proposal-specific consent
Abstract Translated
the rest objected to such research. There was significant difference in the distribution of choices according to health status (patients vs. companions) for MR (adjusted Kruskal-Wallis test P = 0.03) but not to age group, gender, education level, or previous participation in research (unadjusted P = 0.02 - 0.59). The distributions of perceptions of current practice and norm were similar (unadjusted Marginal Homogeneity test P = 0.44 for MR and P = 0.89 for TR), whereas the distributions of preferences and perceptions of norm were different (adjusted P = 0.09 for MR and P = 0.02 for TR). The distributions of perceptions of norm, preferences, and perceptions of current practice for MR were significantly different from those of TR (adjusted P < 0.009 for all). Conclusions:We conclude that: 1) there is a considerable diversity among Saudi views regarding consenting for retrospective research which may be related to health status, 2) the distribution of perceptions of norm was similar to the distribution of perceptions of current practice but different from that of preferences, and 3) MR and TR are perceived differently in regard to consenting.
Primary Classification
18.3
Secondary Classification
18.3;1.3.12;19.5
Primary keywords
attitudes--[pri];biomedical research--[pri];choice behavior--[pri];informed consent--[pri];medical records--[pri];Muslims--[pri];public opinion--[pri];tissue banks--[pri]
Secondary keywords
comparative studies;confidentiality;cultural pluralism;empirical research;health status;hospitals;Islamic ethics;Muslim world;patients;privacy;questionnaires;research subjects;specimen collection;survey;Western world
Subject
Saudi Arabia--[pri]
Subject
retrospective studies--[pri]
Journal Article
BMC Medical Ethics 2010 October 18; 11:18:7 p.
Link for Internet access
Primary Document Type
ja
Call Number
citation
Subject Captions
em
Bibliography
20 refs.
Collection
Citation
“Saudi views on consenting for research on medical records and leftover tissue samples,” Islamic Medical & Scientific Ethics, accessed January 11, 2025, https://imse.ibp.georgetown.domains/items/show/34700.