Democracy: the forgotten challenge for bioethics in the developing countries

Democracy: the forgotten challenge for bioethics in the developing countries

Hussein, Ghaiath M.A.

5/22/09

English

20090522

Background: Bioethics as a field related to the health system and health service delivery has grown in the second half of the 20th century, mainly in North America. This is attributed, the author argues, to mainly three kinds of development that took place in the developed countries at a pace different than the developing countries. They are namely: development of the health system

moral development; and political development. Discussion: This article discusses the factors that impede the development of the field of bioethics from an academic activity to a living field that is known and practiced by the people in the developing countries. They are quite many; however, the emphasis here is on role of the political structure in the developing countries and how it negatively affects the development of bioethics. It presents an argument that if bioethics is to grow within the system of health service, it should be accompanied by a parallel changes in the political mindsets in these countries. Summary: For bioethics to flourish in developing countries, it needs an atmosphere of freedom where people can practice free moral reasoning and have full potential to take their life decisions by themselves. Moreover, bioethics could be a tool for political change through the empowerment of people, especially the vulnerable.To achieve that, the article is proposing a practical framework for facilitating the development of the field of bioethics in the developing countries.

2.1

2.1;21.1

bioethics--[pri];democracy--[pri];developing countries--[pri];freedom--[pri];political systems--[pri]

accountability;autonomy;health care delivery;human rights;moral development;non-Western world;paternalism;politics;principle-based ethics;public participation;religious ethics;research institutes;social impact

Middle East;Sudan

BMC Medical Ethics2009 May 22; 10:3:4 p.

36

ja

citation

12 refs.

14726939